Friday, 29 June 2012

Unpaid carers cost economy £5.3bn, charity warns

Unpaid carers cost economy £5.3bn, charity warns

Over 300,000 carers in England have left employment to provide unpaid care.
 
Carers who give up work to look after others cost England's economy about £5.3bn a year, the charity Age UK says.
 
It says an unfit care system means people often have to give up work to help the elderly or adult disabled.
The figure was calculated on the lost earnings and forgone taxes of more than 300,000 unpaid carers.
The government says its long-awaited white paper on social care is "imminent" and will include funding changes to "transform care".

Michelle Mitchell, charity director general of Age UK said: "For many people, caring for a loved one is second nature and they wouldn't have it any other way.

"But carers should never be forced to sacrifice their own financial security and wellbeing due to the lack of service provision and support from public services.

"Care cannot wait any longer - this is the government's last chance to get it right and set their political legacy for generations to come."

A Department of Health spokesman said: "We agree that helping people to stay in work alongside caring not only helps carers' careers and family finances but is crucial for our workforce and economy.

"The government has committed to working together with the business community to help carers manage work and care."

Social care reform is one of the biggest public policy challenges society faces and, in the current public spending environment, we need to make sure that we get this reform right to deliver lasting change. Reform needed
The Age UK analysis built on work from the London School of Economics in April, adding in loss of wages to previously calculated loss from tax revenues and claimed carers' allowance.

Loss of earnings was estimated using three surveys: the carers survey - to examine the proportion of male to female, part-time to full-time carers, the labour-force survey - to calculate average earnings, and the population estimate.

On Tuesday the Local Government Association warned the rising cost of adult social care could "soak up" almost all of council spending by 2020. Currently, £14.6bn is spent on adult social care services in England.

Last year the economist Andrew Dilnot was asked by ministers to look at how funding could be changed. The Dilnot Commission recommended the means-testing threshold for those needing residential care be increased to £100,000. It also called for a partnership whereby individuals pay the first chunk of their care. It recommended a cap of between £25,000 and £50,000.

Wales and Northern Ireland both have means-tested systems similar to that in England.
Scotland provides free personal care, but in recent years has started tightening the eligibility criteria for the same reasons councils in England have.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-18599455

Thursday, 28 June 2012


Do you recieve a Personal Budget from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, or do you live in RBKC and pay for your own care? If so you might be interested in the following!!

 
-Personal Budget Surgeries.
Do you have difficulties with your Personal Budget, or have experience using one? Do you pay for your own care and want to meet up with other people who use care services? Feel free to come along to our "Surgeries" where you can get / give support.  SURGERIES take place in the Activity Room, Action Disability Kensington and Chelsea.
 
  • 17th July '12                 1.30-3.30
  • 16th August '12            11-1
  • 18th September '12      11-1
  • 18th October '12           11-1
  • 20th November'12        11-1
 
-Personal Budget User Group.
Find out about the lastest developments in Social Care and Personal Budgets. Have your say in decisions that affect Personal Budget and Social Care users locally and Nationally. Talk with special guests who will talk about various issues of interest to PB users. USER GROUP meetings take place in a number of venues around the borough - for more information - make sure you sign up as User Group member.
  • 24th July               11-1
  • 23rd August           11-1
  • 25th September    11-1
  • 25th October         11-1
  • 27th November     11-1

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Workshops for Personal Budget / Social Care recipients in Kensington and Chelsea.

Workshops for Personal Budget / Social Care recipients in Kensington and Chelsea.
The PB Team is considering running a series of Personal Budget / Social Care related workshops.  Whether you receive a social care service from RBKC (in the form of Personal Budget, care in your home and/or a day service) or you pay for care / assistance from your own money – you might be interested in attending some/all of the following workshops.
Below are examples of workshops that people attending our PB User groups and PB Surgery have expressed an interest in.
General- for anyone receiving (or in the process of receiving) a care package from RBKC:
·        Your rights to Community Care;
·        How to make the most of your care needs assessment;
·        Preparing for financial assessment / Identifying your Disability Related Expenditure;
·        What is a Personal Budget anyway? (Pros & Cons, and how to use it);
·        Getting the best from your Personal Budget –Support Planning and creating a budget.
For people who use their Personal Budget, or own money, to employ someone to assist /support them:
·        Advertising for and recruiting a Personal Assistant (non-agency care worker);
·        Employing someone – their rights, your responsibilities;
·        Record keeping / Administration for PB users;
·        How to do your own payroll;
We don’t have dates yet as we need to gauge people’s interest first. If you are interested in attending any of the above and/or if you have a suggestion for a different PB / social care workshop, please contact the PB Team - Jenny (pbsupport@adkc.org.uk) or Martha (pbadmin@adkc.org.uk) / 020 8960 8888. Once dates are finalised we will keep you informed.

Are you a member of the ADKC PB service? Let us know what you think.

During the first few months of the year we conducted a Satisfaction Survey to see what our users thought of the support service that we provide here at ADKC.
We received 28 responses and found that:
·        22 would prefer to get PB related advice from the current ADKC Personal Budget Service compared with Council’s, now disbanded, Self –directed-Support team (3), Social Workers (6), or friend/family (7)
·        18 attended the Peer support meetings / PB surgeries and found them useful. 
·        23 read and enjoyed the quarterly “PB Flash” newsletter.
·        Members received assistance with an average of 9.8 of the 18 topics of assistance offered by the current service.  The most used topics of support were: general advice about PBs /support planning / help with PB forms / support at assessments
·        22 would prefer to have assistance from ADKC to complete their support plan.
·        Members were overwhelmingly positive about the current project.
·        Out of 58 comments, 42 were positive, 3 were negative and 13 neutral (suggestions, statement of fact, etc.)
Here are some of the comments people made:
“[it] keeps me confident to face difficulties”. (H.T)
 “excellent, independent support” (L.K)
“It is indispensible and a vital link” (S.M)
“[it] should continue [particularly for] those less confident to manage our PB” (P.D)
“Hearing others experiences … helps empower individuals” (V.S)

If you have used our service and haven’t yet had your say and wish to do so – you can do so electronically at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/B9YPS3T or you can contact the PB Team and we can send you a paper version / help you to complete it over the phone.

Co-production: why Scie is giving a bigger voice to service users and carers - Guardian

Co-production: why Scie is giving a bigger voice to service users and carers

Service users have experience, skills and expertise that we will harness in designing products and programmes
At its best, co-production can not only improve but change care and support. Illustration: Getty Images
Consulting with service users was probably a radical thing to do a few years ago, but we're a greedy lot and we want so much more. I'm so pleased to have joined the Social Care Institute for Excellence (Scie) as a trustee. We want to get providers and commissioners to adopt approaches that move away from treating people as passive recipients of services, designed and delivered by someone else. As a former chair, Lady Jane Campbell, says: "At its birth, Scie secured firm foundations in user involvement. The principle informs the way that we research, design and develop all our work."
This started off with what we called "participation". It meant involving service users in activities; seeking their opinions so that the design and delivery of services could be as good as possible. For instance, back in 2006 we produced a report Doing it for Themselves: participation and black and minority ethnic service users. This concluded that, over the previous 20 years, mainstream service-user participation in social care had increased markedly whereas black and minority ethnic participation had diminished over the same period. More recently we've looked at user involvement in adult safeguarding. Many approaches can be used to support the involvement of people who use services, for instance by involving users in training professionals.

Co-production – what it means

We've had an independent evaluation and now we've concluded it's time take things to the next level and embrace "co-production". What we are developing is an equal partnership with people who use services. This new policy, which grew out of an independent evaluation of Scie's participation work, will mean that Scie is working towards co-producing all its work with service users and carers.
When we looked at the research on what co-production could mean for adult social care, we found the best approach "emphasises that people are not passive recipients of services and have assets and expertise which can help improve services." This also means involving citizens in "collaborative relationships with more empowered frontline staff, who are able and confident to share power and accept user expertise". At its best, co-production can not only improve, but change care and support. This is summed up in our research briefing: Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation.
So, there's a growing realisation that people don't simply have needs that have to be met; they have assets (experience, skills and expertise) which can improve services. Staff should be supported to understand the benefits of co-production, to collaborate and share power.
I know how important it is for service users to be involved like this. My particular field of interest and specialism is mental health. I have enduring mental health problems, having used services over many years. I bring this perspective to the Scie board and I'm really excited to be joining; I get the chance to dispel myths about discrimination surrounding mental health problems. And I want to see service users becoming equal partners and the co-creators of Scie products and programmes. I'll be championing this thought at the first meeting of our new co-production network on 28 June.
Tina Coldham is a trustee of the Social Care Institute for Excellence

http://www.guardian.co.uk/social-care-network/2012/jun/26/coproduction-scie-service-users-carers

Rising adult care costs leave councils facing £16.5bn black hole - Community Care

Rising adult care costs leave councils facing £16.5bn black hole

Funding gap underlines need for government to urgently reform adult social care funding, says Local Government Association.
Adult care set to exceed 45% of council budgets by 2020.

Tuesday 26 June 2012 00:01
Councils in England face a £16.5bn funding shortfall by 2020 due to the escalating costs of adult social care and government cuts, the Local Government Association warned today.
The LGA said the black hole, which measures the gap between projected funding for councils and the cost of maintaining services at current levels, illustrated the urgency of reforming adult social care funding.
With the government due to produce a White Paper on social care reform shortly, the LGA said ministers needed to inject immediate resources into adult care to meet existing resource gaps while also implementing longer-term reforms to make the system more sustainable.
The LGA's analysis involves projections, based on government estimates, that Whitehall funding for councils will fall from 2015-20, compounding the 28% cut in real-terms funding for local authorities from 2011-15. At the same time demography will fuel additional demand for adult social care, meaning that spending on the service will exceed 45% of council budgets by 2019-20, and implying massive cuts to services such as libraries and leisure.
LGA chair Merrick Cockell said: “By the end of the decade councils may be forced to wind down some of the most popular services they provide unless urgent action is taken to address the crisis in adult social care funding.

“Efficiency savings won’t go close to solving this problem. We need an immediate injection of money into the adult care system to meet rising demand in the short term, alongside a major revision of the way it is paid for and delivered in future.”

Direct payment numbers stall amid hike in personal budgets

Direct payment numbers stall amid hike in personal budgets

Survey of directors finds personal budget numbers rose by 40% from 2011-12 but direct payment levels stalled for the second year running, despite evidence cash payments deliver better outcomes for users.


Monday 25 June 2012 00:01
Direct payment numbers in England have stalled for the second year despite evidence they deliver better outcomes than council-managed personal budgets, whose numbers have soared.
About 430,000 people were receiving personal budgets in March 2012, a rise of 38% on the March 2011 figure, found the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services' annual survey on progress, published today.
This means that, one year out from the government's April 2013 target of having all ongoing users of council-funded community support on personal budgets, 53% of this group are receiving them.
The news was hailed by Adass president Sarah Pickup, who said it meant "most councils [were] well on the way" to achieving the April 2013 target of providing all community service users with transparency over the cost of their support and choice over how it is spent.
Direct payments stable
However, Adass reported that direct payment numbers had remained stable from 2011-12 meaning that for the second year running the growth in personal budgets had come mainly in the form of funds managed on users' behalf by councils.
This is despite last year's national personal budgets survey of 2,000 users and carers finding that those on direct payments "reported significantly more positive outcomes than people receiving council-managed budgets".  Though the amount spent by councils on direct payments rose by 30% from 2010-11 to 2011-12, this was well below the overall increase in spending on personal budgets of 57%, found Adass.
There are concerns that in some cases managed personal budgets involve councils simply identifying the cost of a person's support without giving them much choice over how it is spent. For instance, people on managed personal budgets can be restricted to spending their funds on a limited number of providers.
The rise in personal budget numbers was welcomed by Think Local Act Personal, the sector coalition tasked with taking forward personalisation. However, its co-chairs, Sue Bott and Bill Davidson, said: "Councils need to ensure that when people are taking the option of a managed personal budget they are exercising significant choice and control...Importantly, councils should continue to strive to improve the offer of direct payments to all, including those groups where the current take up is lower."
There are still significant variations in personal budget take-up between areas though there was a sharp fall in the number of councils with low rates of personal budget use, found the Adass survey. Just 9 councils - 7% of the total - had a take-up rate of 0-25% - down from 35 the previous year, while the number with a take-up rate of 25% to 50% fell from 71 to 45.

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/25/06/2012/118307/direct-payment-numbers-stall-amid-hike-in-personal-budgets.htm

Why have direct payment levels stalled?

Why have direct payment levels stalled?

| 2 Comments

[Blog updated 12.20pm - For a good perspective on this read this post from Martin Routledge, programme manager for Think Local Act Personal and head of operations at In Control. He emphasises that there has been some good news around direct payments - a 30% increase in their value from 2011-12 despite the lack of growth in numbers of recipients.]

I don't know but here are a few possible reasons:

1) Many service users prefer managed personal budgets. When the previous government proposed introducing personal budgets in its 2005 social care green paper, one of its justifications was to provide people with an option that offered greater choice and control than traditionally commissioned care without the "potential burdens" of a direct payment i.e. the council-managed budget. This line was developed with older people in mind given their historically low take-up of direct payments and the belief that this was related to a reluctance to take on the responsibilities of a cash payment, such as employing staff. Personal budgets for older people appear to be growing at a faster rate than for other groups, meaning that there could be something in this explanation; but it's clearly not the whole story.

2) Councils are chasing the government's target of having all eligible service users on personal budgets by April 2013. Concerns have been voiced, by Adass among others, that the government's target has had perverse consequences by encouraging councils to get people on to personal budgets without providing them with true choice and control. It is arguably easier to bump up your personal budget take-up rates by getting people on to managed personal budgets than direct payments. This could be because rolling out managed personal budgets may involve less change to councils' IT systems or relationships and contracts with providers, and may well involve less investment with service users in support planning. 

3) Councils are looking to retain control of their finances. With a managed budget, councils keep their hands on the money, something that may appeal to officers at a time of budget cuts. Managed budgets offer the potential to use councils' buying power in the social care market to keep providers' prices down. They could also save councils the bother of working to reshape the social care market in a more creative and diverse direction. However, against this, it is argued that direct payments enable the sort of creative planning and use of resources that can reduce the cost of care packages.

4) Professionals are making risk-averse assumptions. In a report last year, Alzheimer's Society found many people with dementia were not even being offered a personal budget (let alone a direct payment) in part because of risk-averse assumptions from social care professionals. Such risk-aversion may lead professionals to assume managed budgets may be more appropriate for people with dementia and other groups and not discuss the potential benefits of a direct payment.

5) Direct payments offered are not of sufficient value. It could be that people are turning down direct payments because they are not of sufficient value to enable them to purchase the support that they need. There are reported cases of service users not being able to afford to use a direct payment to purchase care from a provider of their choice; this is particularly the case in relation to home care agencies. It could also be the case that councils are cutting back on funding for direct payment support services, often delivered through user-led organisations, that provide an invaluable role in helping people manage the responsibilities of a direct payment. 

There could be any number of other reasons. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on this so please comment in the usual way.
 

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

The Olympics/paralympics are coming - make care arrangements now.

The Olympics/ Paralympics are coming –
make care arrangements now!!!

London is gearing up for the Games in July/August and September. Although for visitors coming to experience the Games it will (hopefully) seem well organised, for people living/working in London there will be lots of upheaval. For people receiving care services, this will be a trying time – so start making arrangements now to ensure that you still get the care and support you need!

 The biggest problem will be delays on Public Transport as well as on the roads. Some Public transport will be re-routed. This could affect your workers – think about how your Personal Assistant (PA) or care worker will get to you.

 If you employ a Personal Assistant (PA /private Care worker) you might want to consider, if it is possible:

·        Having you PA come at different times – for example travelling when spectators are already in their venues so the roads / public transport are quieter.
·        Coming on a different day from usual
·        Having one longer visit each day, instead of a few short visits
·        Having a worker who lives close to you to work more during the Games and the other PAs can catch up after the Games.
·        Prioritising tasks that need to be done urgently/ regularly and seeing which non-urgent tasks can be left for a less busy time / after the Games.
·        Suggesting you PA uses different methods of transport – for example using a bike, or coming on foot if they aren’t too far away.
http://www.getaheadofthegames.com/ - for more advice and information

If you use an agency for your care –

·        Ask the agency what plans they have in place (and if they haven’t got plans, ask when they will have plans).
·        Tell them what you CAN be flexible with (for example, changes to times and days of visits, accepting other workers if necessary)
·        Tell them everything you CAN’T be flexible with (assistance with meals, taking medication at certain times, having help to use the toilet a certain number of times a day, specific appointments that you MUST keep).

The more advance planning the better - whether you employ a PA or get assistance from an Agency.

If you need assistance to ensure that your care and support run smoothly – feel free to contact the PB Team for help and advice. Also, whether you pay for care/support yourself, or you receive a Personal Budget – you are welcome to come to our PB meetings.  Contact Jenny or Martha (020 8960 8888) for more information.


Personal health budgets pilot - fifth interim evaluation report published


19/06/2012
Personal health budgets pilot - fifth interim evaluation report published
The fifth interim independent evaluation report about the pilot programme has been published by the personal health budgets evaluation (PHBE) team.
The fifth interim independent evaluation report about the pilot programme has been published by the personal health budgets evaluation (PHBE) team.

"Experiences and outcomes for budget holders at nine months" interviews 52 budget holders and 13 carers in the pilot about their experiences of personal health budgets after nine months.

These interviews suggest there is widespread potential for personal health budgets to lead to improvements in health and wellbeing. The majority of people with a personal health budget benefited through both improved health outcomes and increased satisfaction levels. Increased self-confidence, a better social life, reduced use of GP services and prescriptions and better relationships with health professionals were among the other reported benefits.

As budget holders' health improved, they reported needing to rely less on family carers; less anxiety and stress on the part of relatives; and increased ability to take part in family activities. Carers also reported direct benefits when personal health budgets reduced the amount of care they had to give and indirect benefits from seeing improvements in the well-being of the person they supported.

As with the fourth interim report on the pilot published in October 2011, this report highlights that the role of information, advice and support is vitally important. The report identifies some challenges, and work continues to explore these in more detail, to develop methods to overcome them and help the NHS to deliver personal health budgets in the longer term.

Read the report in full on the Learning Network.
Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
News Item - Personal health budgets pilot - fifth interim evaluation report
For all our latest news visit http://www.dh.gov.uk/personalhealthbudgets
Personal health budgets delivery team
The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London SW1A 2NS

Email: personalhealthbudgets@dh.gsi.gov.uk
Tel: 020 7972 3045

To unsubscribe from future Personal health budgets Learning Network emails please visit the address below.
http://www.personalhealthbudgets.dh.gov.uk/unsubscribe/?n=731

Monday, 18 June 2012

Unpaid carers being 'let down by failing social care'


Tracy Sloan almost missed her own cancer diagnosis because she was looking after her disabled son


The UK's "army of unpaid carers" is being "let down" by the failing social care system, campaigners warn.

Eight leading charities, including Age UK and Carers UK, have joined together to highlight the plight they face under the umbrella of Carers Week.

Feedback from 3,400 carers showed those providing the most intensive care often ended up with health problems themselves.

The government said there was now extra funding to allow carers' breaks.

It is estimated that one in six carers either give up work or reduce their hours to look after elderly friends and relatives or younger adults with disabilities.

The charities said it demonstrated the hidden effect of the squeeze on council-run social care support.

The numbers of elderly and younger adults getting help from councils has fallen in recent years.

And the coalition of charities said it was the 6.4m unpaid carers who were being left to take up the strain.

It asked carers what impact caring and the lack of support had on their health. Most of the responses to the self-selected poll were from those heavily involved in caring for someone, often providing support on a daily basis.

Eight in 10 said their responsibilities had caused them health problems, including everything from back pain to insomnia.

And two fifths said they had delayed seeking medical help with some reporting that had had serious consequences, such as delayed cancer diagnoses and damage to lungs.

The coalition said carers should be offered regular health checks and there needed to be better information and support available.

'SO FULL ON'

Tracy Sloan, 45, has cared for her son Phillip, who has severe cerebral palsy, for 20 years.
Last year, she put off a regular screening appointment and then discovered she had womb cancer.
"Looking after Phillip is so full on that it just didn't occur to me to keep an eye on my own health.
"I was really shocked when I discovered I had cancer and needed an operation.
"I came home from hospital exhausted, emotional and fragile.
"I needed the chance to rest but instead I had to deal with Phillip's demands too and that took its toll on my recovery."

Carers Week manager Helen Clarke said: "It's a scandal that carers can't get the time or support they need to look after themselves which could be jeopardising their health as a result.

"Carers are feeling the strain of a woefully underfunded system and still we're seeing more cuts.

"Unpaid carers save the Government a fortune - £119 billion a year - yet they're let down in return. It is time for urgent action to tackle the crisis in social care."

This is just the latest research to highlight the problems facing the social care system.

Councils themselves acknowledge they are struggling to meet demand.

Last week a survey of social care chiefs showed that cuts were still being made despite the government pumping extra money into the system.

Sarah Pickup, president of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, said: "It could not be clearer that there is a desperate need for politicians from all parties to quickly find an answer to how we, as a nation, are going to adequately fund social care services in the future."

Ministers have promised the system will be reformed.

A Department of Health spokesperson said £400m of additional NHS funding had been allocated until 2015 to pay for carers' breaks.

She added: "We know how important it is for carers to be able to take a break from their caring responsibilities, to protect their own physical and mental health.

"We also want to place the rights of carers on a much firmer footing, so that the law recognises carers' rights and their role in caring for others."

A social care white paper is expected to be published in England in the coming weeks, but there are fears the trickiest issue - how to fund it - will be put off.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-18456546

Sunday, 17 June 2012

Councils cutting £2bn from adult care over two years

Councils cutting £2bn from adult care over two years

Association of Directors of Adult Social Services urges government to put in place sustainable funding system as survey finds £890m due to be taken out of care budgets this year. Councils may have to reduce access to care without funding reform, says Adass's Sarah Pickup

 
Mithran Samuel
Thursday 14 June 2012 15:28
 
Councils are due to make about £2bn in adult care funding cuts from 2011-13 in response to the government's deficit reduction plan, the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services has revealed.
Directors representing 145 of the 152 authorities in England are due to make £890m in savings this year, found Adass's annual budget survey. This is in addition to £991m in savings identified in last year's Adass survey covering 2011-12, the first year of the government's cuts programme.
Directors say 77% of this year's reductions (£688m) will be achieved through service re-design and efficiency savings; of the rest, £77m will come from increased charges for services and £113m (13%) from reducing levels of services. For instance, six councils have raised their eligibility thresholds from moderate to substantial.
'Desperate need' for reform
Adass warned that service reductions would increase as a percentage of overall savings without government action to introduce a sustainable social care funding system, as councils were having to balance declining budgets against increasing demographic pressures and rising costs of care.
"It could not be clearer that there is a desperate need for politicians from all parties quickly to find an answer to how we, as a nation, are going to adequately fund social care services in the future," said Adass president Sarah Pickup. Without this, she said, there was a "real risk that access to care will have to be restricted", and fees to providers "squeezed further with a risk to ongoing capacity and quality of care".
Her comments come weeks before the government produces a White Paper on adult care that is expected to sidestep both the issue of existing shortfalls in resources and the proposals for longer-term reform set out by the Dilnot commission last year, which include a £35,000 cap on lifetime care costs.
NHS funding 'propping up' care services
Concerns were also raised about how councils planned to spend resources transferred from the NHS, designed to fund social care services that benefited the health service and promote integration between the two services. Adass found that 35% of resources transferred in 2012-13 had been allocated to avoid social care service cuts and 12% to deal with funding pressures.
"It is significant that nearly half the money allocated from the NHS budget to improve joint working between health and social care is being spent on propping up existing services and mitigating the impact of budget cuts," said King's Fund senior fellow Richard Humphries. "Using NHS funding as a sticking plaster does not address the pressures facing social care."
"This survey reinforces the need to move much more quickly to achieve closer integration between health and social care and deliver a long-term funding settlement for social care based on the proposals set out by the Dilnot Commission."
Behind the Adass figures
The 145 directors surveyed plan to spend about £13.2bn in 2012-13 between them, having spent £13.4bn in 2011-12. The reason this £200m budget reduction is significantly smaller than the £890m of savings allocated is that councils have put in money to the adult social care budget to cover the impact of inflation and demographic pressures.
It is reasonable to talk in terms of an £890m reduction in adult social care spending, rather than a £200m reduction, as the money to cover inflation and demography is designed, in effect, to help councils "stand still".
Compared with last year, councils have found a greater proportion of savings from service redesign, 77% up from 69%, and a reduced proportion from service cuts, 13% down from 23%.
Directors surveyed are already earmarking savings for 2013-14 (£480m) and 2014-15 (£340m), both years in which government funding for councils will fall. It is also worth stressing that the totals in the survey reflect the responses of 145 authorities, 95% of the total. So the totals spent - and saved - by all 152 authorities will be greater.
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/14/06/2012/118290/councils-cutting-2bn-from-adult-care-over-two-years.htm

Personal budgets for older people to be reviewed

Personal budgets for older people to be reviewed

Think Local Act Personal probe to address concerns that personal budgets are not working as well for older people as other groups.


Mithran Samuel
Friday 15 June 2012 12:35
 
A review will be held into how personal budgets can work better for older people in response to calls from adult directors to examine barriers to take-up and successful outcomes for the group.
The review will be led by Think Local Act Personal (TLAP), the sector coalition set up to help implement personalisation, and will seek to find solutions to the problems afflicting personal budgets for older people, drawing on existing good practice.
The current personal budgets system was not flexible enough to give older people choice and control over their care and address safeguarding concerns, said the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services in a report in March that called for such a review to be undertaken.
Issues cited by Adass included:-
  • People with dementia not being offered personal budgets.
  • Low rates of direct payment take-up among older people, with many taking council-managed personal budgets instead.
  • Concerns over safeguarding issues and the employment responsibilities faced by older people when they employ personal assistants.
TLAP programme manager Martin Routledge said the review would look at how older people who wanted them could access direct payments, while also ensuring council-managed personal budgets provided genuine choice and control for those who did not want a cash payment.
The TLAP inquiry, conducted with the Social Care Institute for Excellence, will start with a review of existing data and research on the issue, identifying barriers to personal budget take-up and good outcomes. This will run from June to September.
Then, from October 2012 to March 2013, the review team will start working with a range of organisations to explore and test good practice in making personal budgets work for older people. Good practice measures will be incorporated into peer reviews of local authorities, conducted under the sector-led Towards Excellence in Adult Social Care programme. There could be a further phase of testing of good practice but this is subject to confirmation.
Adass also raised concerns about the government's goal of having all eligible service users on personal budgets by April 2013, saying that this had led councils to focus on meeting this timetable rather than ensuring genuine choice and control for personal budget holders.
However, the government is expected to confirm that it will retain the target in its forthcoming White Paper on social care.
"Our project in itself won't solve the challenge [of meeting the April 2013 goal]," said Routledge. "What we will be able to do is identify some promising approaches that we can circulate [to councils]. We aren't just interested in numbers [of older people on personal budgets]."
Mithran Samuel is Community Care's adults editor.
 

Public Consultation: Home Care - A Community Consultation Event

Public Consultation: Home Care - A Community Consultation Event
'How do we achieve dignified and compassionate home care? Community Consultation Event'

These events are for all stakeholders including providers, users of home care, carers, care managers, health care professionals and voluntary organisations. Our aim is to work together as part of the new tri borough structure to look at how we can best provide a dignified and compassionate home care service for the future. This consultation will be a key factor in this. The events are being facilitated by Frameworks4Change, an organisation that is committed to dignity and compassion within a caring environment.

Please join us and be a part of this consultation - dates below:

Fri 29th June 2012, 09:00am-12:30pm - Small Hall, Kensington Town Hall,

Mon 2nd July 2012, 1:00pm-4:30pm - Westminster City Hall 17th floor rooms 5-7

Thur 5th July, AM - Small Hall, Hammersmith Town Hall

Tues 10th July, PM - THT Lighthouse West London, 111-117 Lancaster Road , LONDON, W11 1QT

Refreshments will be available but no lunch will be provided

Please RSVP as indicated below:

For all people who use home care and their carers, please send your replies to Paula Murphy, Hestia: Community Engagement Manager
Email: rbkclink@hestia.org Tel: 020 8968 7049

For all other stakeholders please send your replies to Michelle Quigley, Business Support, Tri-borough Commissioning Team
Email: Michelle.Quigley@rbkc.gov.uk Tel: 020 7361 2436

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

Carers Kensington and Chelsea - Events for Carers' week


Carers Kensington & Chelsea Events for Carers Week

June 2012

This year Carers Kensington & Chelsea would like to invite all carers to the following events –



Monday 18th June 12pm - 4pm Pampering and Health Event

THT Lighthouse, 111-117 Lancaster Road, Ladbroke Grove, London,

W11 1QT

Come and join us for a massage session, enjoy free refreshments

and get advice on healthy lifestyle choices from one of the Health

Trainers!

You need to book your massage session – please see details

below.



Wednesday 20th June 11am - 3pm Carers Week Information

Event

Small Hall in Kensington Town Hall, Horton Street, London, W8 7NX

Come and join us to find out what support is available for carers –

you will find information stalls covering a whole range of health and

wellbeing issues, information on local advice services, information on

aids and adaptations and much more. There will be speeches from

the Chief Executive of Carers UK and others and you can enjoy a

free delicious lunch too!

No need to book – just come along on the day



Thursday 21st June 12pm - 4pm Carers Stress-Busting

Relaxation Day

Chelsea Theatre, 7 Worlds End Place, London, SW10 0RD

The reality of caring can be stressful – come and relax with free yoga and meditation workshops for carers. Free refreshments will be provided.

You need to book your workshop sessions – please see details below.



Tea at Peter Jones

And if that was not enough, how about taking a break with coffee and a piece of cake? Peter Jones, Sloane Square, SW1W 8EL, with Carers Kensington & Chelsea, are offering 25 carers café vouchers for use at Peter Jones during Carers Week. Vouchers will be allocated on a first come, first served basis with only one voucher per carer, so contact Carers Kensington & Chelsea quickly to be in with a chance!



All our events are free of charge.

Please let us know if you would like to book a massage session and/or a place on a yoga or meditation session by calling our freephone on 0800 032 1089. If the phone goes through to voicemail please leave your name and phone number and tell us which session or sessions you would like to attend. You can also ask for a Peter Jones voucher by leaving us a voicemail message.

Or email us at kandc@carersuk.org and let us know the sessions you would like to book and/or whether you would like a Peter Jones voucher.

But who looks after the carers?

But who looks after the carers?

GPs are at last realising that giving support early on can reduce the strain on those who care for family or friends.
It is estimated that one in three adults will become a carer in the next 10 years.
 
I didn't know the term "carer" when I first became one in 1999, but I soon felt the effects of isolation, anxiety and depression that are commonplace when looking after someone else long term. Caring for my young adult daughter, I felt I had fallen into a parallel world where my tedious role lacked definition and was merely a necessary extension of parenting. I wrote about my experiences in the Who cares? column for Society Guardian and was subsequently invited on to the inaugural Standing Commission on Carers set up by the last government. With a rapidly ageing population, it realised that the nation's army of unpaid carers was integral and required support to continue its vital work.
It is estimated that one in three adults will become a carer in the next 10 years, with over 20% caring for more than 50 hours a week, and most doing so without outside assistance.
Like me, many carers don't think of themselves as such, yet if they are unable to cope, it could lead to an emergency situation, with the person they care for having to be admitted into hospital.
A survey released next week for Carers Week will show that many carers are indeed buckling under the strain. However, evidence suggests that when carers are supported early in their role, crises can be avoided.
The GP surgery is the obvious place to identify and signpost carers towards appropriate services, but historically it has been difficult to engage doctors with the issue of carer support. Their role was to look after the sick patient not the person caring for the patient. I had frequent contact with my GP's surgery about my daughter's illness, but didn't consider that my own health was relevant.
In recent years, though, I have witnessed first-hand how doctors have come round to acknowledge the importance of supporting carers. This is particularly the case with younger family doctors, who recognise that by helping carers, everyone benefits: the person being cared for, the carer and the primary healthcare team.

Win-win situation
Dr Sachin Gupta, a GP in Welwyn Garden City, is typical of this new generation of GP. He says: "By keeping carers healthy we can reduce referrals to secondary care and hospital admissions. This is a win-win situation for GPs, carers, the people they care for and the NHS. I came into this profession to make a difference to the lives of people and this is a great opportunity to do so."
Gupta is one of an initial group of nine GPs who have been recruited regionally by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) to champion the needs of carers. They work with liaison workers from the charity network Carers Trust and carer ambassadors from Carers UK to strengthen local links between GP surgeries and support services, and to share best practice.
When I became involved with the RCGP four years ago in an initiative funded by the Department of Health to support carers in general practice, it was already working with the Princess Royal Trust for Carers (now Carers Trust) to produce an action guide. My role, along with two practising GPs, was to use the guide's material in a series of nationwide workshops for primary healthcare staff to demonstrate the benefits of engaging with carers.
At the first workshop in Hertfordshire, where my GP colleague knew several of the participating doctors, our presentation was welcomed. A fortnight later in Lancashire, the reception was quite different, and doctors were adamant that the last thing they needed was the additional burden of carers. Surely, they argued, carers were the responsibility of council social care services, not the health service. This became a common theme during subsequent workshops, particularly from older, male GPs.
But by generating discussion through a series of case studies, we always succeeded in demonstrating the mutual benefit of identifying and supporting carers. After all, it is the carer who carries out the doctor's recommendations and knows the patient better; by recognising the carer as an expert partner in the patient's treatment plan, the doctor has a valuable aid, we argued.
Since 2008, each workshop has taken us a step closer to breaking down the divide between primary care staff and carers. Much of the support that carers need cannot be provided by the GP practice, but, once identified, a carer can be signposted to appropriate services. To this end, many practices now appoint a carers' lead – a member of staff who facilitates the identification of carers and acts as a conduit between the GP surgery and local services. As well as Carers UK and Carers Trust, there are other agencies that offer carer support, including Age UK and Action for Children as well as illness-specific groups. Service provision varies widely but carers' leads have contact with what is available locally.
In Worcestershire, a county-wide GP-based carer support service launches next week following a successful pilot in three areas. The service was commissioned and will be provided by Worcestershire Association of Carers, which will place carer support advisers within surgeries, providing one-to-one support for carers and signposting them to appropriate services. There will be 6.5 full-time advisers working across 68 GP practices.
Issues with capacity
Helen Garfield, project officer at the joint commissioning unit at Worcestershire county council acknowledges that the service may have issues with capacity. She says the money awarded by the primary care trust and managed by the three Worcestershire clinical commissioning groups also has to enhance the services that carers will be referred to.
"We have expanded our 24-hour phone information and support helpline for carers, and increased our flexible breaks service, which will allow more carers to receive up to four hours per week replacement care. It was a delicate balancing act," she explains, between funding the advisers and building the capacity of countywide services that could experience a huge rise in demand.
The scheme was showcased at a national carers' conference in Birmingham earlier this year at which I was pleasantly surprised to hear care services minister Paul Burstow talk as though he genuinely believed in the imperative of better support for carers through primary care.
Let's hope this isn't just talk, because more is needed, including designated financing for regular health checks for carers. Although available in some areas, health checks are not routinely offered despite research suggesting that carers experience increased mortality. Carers neglect their own health needs in favour of those they care for, resulting in a high prevalence of depression and muscular strain along with a greater risk of many physical illnesses including stroke.
There is still a lot for primary healthcare teams to learn, and many of the GP champions are new to post, but the enthusiasm from this predominantly young group of doctors is encouraging. As Becky Steed, a GP champion from Nottingham, says: "For every person with a long-term physical or mental health condition there is almost certainly a carer too. If we can recognise their needs as well as the person that they care for, we can help to safeguard their health and hopefully make life a little easier for all concerned."
If such positive attitudes had been evident when I was looking after my daughter I might not have felt so marginalised or impotent. Instead, I might have recognised that being her carer as well as her mother was a dual role, and important.
• Carers Week is 18-24 June. Details at carersweek.org
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jun/12/but-who-looks-after-the-carers